Roadmap

Practical improvements before platform sprawl.

Cloud Waste Scanner will stay focused on a tight operating loop: local scan, evidence review, owner handoff, and verified closure. This page is written as a product commitment, not a wishlist.

Now Make the first scan easier to trust and easier to hand off.
Next Deepen expensive resource coverage without changing the local trust model.
Later Add automation only where review gates and rollback context are clear.
Shipping

Evidence and first-run quality

The scanner should be useful before a team creates a program around it.

01Finding explanations

Sharper reasons, confidence labels, and caution notes for idle compute, unattached storage, snapshots, IPs, load balancers, and Kubernetes findings.

02Export packages

PDF, CSV, and handoff manifests that help finance, engineering, and platform owners review the same evidence without chasing screenshots.

03Setup diagnostics

Clearer feedback for credential scope, proxy routing, failed scan checks, and cases where no useful data was collected.

Planned

Expensive waste coverage

Depth matters most where the monthly bill can move materially.

04Kubernetes and GPU evidence

Persistent volume drift, LoadBalancer services, node baselines, GPU reservations, and owner gaps brought into the same local review queue.

05Provider-specific checks

More precise review paths for managed databases, storage lifecycle drift, network billing artifacts, and regional resource leftovers.

06Review grouping

Better grouping by owner, account, provider, resource type, priority, and confidence so teams can split review work cleanly.

Researching

Automation with guardrails

Automation should remove repeat work after the evidence model is strong enough.

07Local API workflows

Scheduled local scans, internal reporting pipelines, and export automation without requiring a hosted collector.

08Execution plan review

Approval notes, rollback context, masked exports, and policy simulation before recurring cleanup workflows are used.

09Team operating model

Owner queues, closure tracking, reopened findings, and audit-friendly evidence history for teams that repeat the process weekly.

Non-negotiable boundary

No hosted collector requirement for the core scan path. Credentials and raw scan output stay on the operator machine unless the operator chooses to export.

What we will avoid

No blind deletion workflow, no vague “AI optimization” button, and no broad platform expansion before local scan and handoff quality are excellent.

How priorities move

Operator feedback wins when it reduces review time, lowers cleanup risk, or makes evidence easier to defend in a real team process.

Influence the queue

Send the blocked review, not a feature slogan.

The most useful feedback is concrete: the provider, resource type, review step, evidence gap, and what decision the team could not make.

Share feedback